From the category archives:

Arizona

AZ Snowbowl Fails on Environmental Scorecard

by admin on February 20, 2013

February 18, 2013
AZ Snowbowl Fails on Environmental Scorecard

Ski Area Environmental Scorecard

Utah’s Park City Mountain Resort tops this year’s Ski Area Environmental Scorecard, receiving 93 percent of possible points and getting an A grade, while Arizona Snowbowl’s comes in last place, scoring 42.2 percent and earning a D.

The 11th annual report card, compiled by the Sierra Nevada Alliance on behalf of the Ski Area Citizens’ Coalition, finds that 32 percent of ski resorts throughout the western U.S. (27 out of 84) are expanding their buildings, ski runs or associated facilities. Most of those expansions intruded into public lands with long-term impacts on wildlife habitat and the region’s water resources, the group found.

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

By LESLIE MACMILLAN
Yellowish traces (look closely) at Arizona Snowbowl, where snow made from wastewater was deployed for the first time over the holidays.
Rudy Preston Yellowish traces (look closely) at Arizona Snowbowl, where snow made from wastewater was deployed for the first time over the holidays.

After a decade of legal battles, a ski resort in Northern Arizona recently became the first in the world to make artificial snow totally out of sewage effluent. On Dec. 24, Arizona Snowbowl fired up its snow guns for the first time, and to everyone’s surprise, the snow that blasted onto the mountain was yellow.

The discolored snow has sharpened an already fraught conflict.

Snowbowl’s manager, J. R. Murray, said the problem was caused by rusty residue in the new snow-making equipment that carries the wastewater from neighboring Flagstaff, where it is piped directly from the town’s sewage treatment plant.

But Taylor McKinnon of the Center for Biological Diversity, a conservation group, says something seems fishy. “I question whether that explanation is based on tests of the water or conjecture,” he said.  ”Something’s awry, and the onus is on the Forest Service and ADEQ to protect the public and determine the cause.” (ADEQ is the acronym for the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.)

Discolored Slopes Mar Debut of Snow-Making Effort

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Walking in a fecal wonderland

by admin on October 4, 2012

The Arizona Snowbowl resort has found a way to turn human sewage into snow, giving new meaning to “slippery slope”

By Lynn Parramore This article originally appeared on AlterNet. AlterNet

Winter brings wonderland dreams of pristine, snow-covered landscapes. At the Arizona Snowbowl resort, you can ski on it. You can sip hot chocolate gazing upon it. You can even get married on it.

But you might not want to make snow cones out of it. Because this year at Snowbowl, that twinkling white powder will be made from human sewage.

Three cheers for America’s innovative capitalists, who are leading the world in turning shit into snow. This year, the Arizona ski resort, located near Flagstaff, will become the first ever to charge humans to glide about in their own waste: 100% pure sewage effluent. How’d you like to face-plant in that?

If that’s not horrible enough, the mountain is sacred to Native Americans, who are outraged over its desecration. Navajo Klee Benally has spent years fighting the resort’s expansion. But in February, a federal appeals court ruled in favor the plans, which had been opposed by 13 Native American tribes and environmental groups.

Walking in a fecal wonderland

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

*Indigenous Elders and Medicine Peoples Council Statement attached.

FLAGSTAFF, AZ — U.S. Forest Service officials have threatened Indigenous spiritual leaders, medicine people, and elders with legal implications if they keep alive the sacred fire at a ceremony on the sacred/holy San Francisco Peaks.

Although a voluntary closure order for the Traditional Cultural Gathering was previously granted by Coconino Forest Supervisor M. Earl Stewart, Stewart apparently changed his position and issued the threat as the four day ceremony was initiated on July 4th, 2012.

When confronted by Forest Service officials, members of the Indigenous Elders and Medicine Peoples Council, the group hosting the Traditional Cultural Gathering, invited Forest Service officials to sit with elders to resolve the Forest Service’s concerns with the ceremonial  fire. Coconino Forest Supervisor Stewart stated in a letter dated July 5, 2012, “non-compliance will result in citations for having a fire during restrictions and/or camping in a closure area without a special use permit.”

Indigenous Elders and Medicine Peoples Council had worked to inform the Coconino National Forest of this ceremony since December 2011 and again met with Coconino Tribal Relations on February 27 and June 21 of 2012 to answer questions and to make sure the Forest Service was fully aware of the Council’s activities.

On May 17, 2012, the Forest Service was notified that a sacred fire was central to the Traditional Cultural Gathering.

The Indigenous Elders and Medicine Peoples Council is calling for support to address this serious disruption and violation of the Traditional Cultural Gathering. Please call and email the following Forest Service officials and urge them not to assault and desecrate the sacred fire:

[click to continue…]

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

CYNDY COLE and JOE FERGUSON Sun Staff Reporters
New tests have confirmed in Flagstaff what researchers in Minnesota first observed:

that even highly treated wastewater might contain trace elements of gene material from dead bacteria resistant to some widely used antibiotics.

One scientist said this week he would be more concerned if the resistant material was in live, viable bacteria that had survived the treatment process.
But until such DNA is destroyed, it raises unanswered questions about whether even DNA fragments in the treated effluent are a threat to human health.
It also raises political and financial questions about whether a small city will investigate matters on the cutting edge of science — and how to pay for it.
Flagstaff officials stated on Tuesday that they would not immediately launch an inquiry.

Read more

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Superbugs in wastewater a worry

by admin on December 19, 2011

JOEL N. SHURKIN, ISNS Contributor Inside Science News Service | Posted: Sunday, November 20, 2011

Even a very good wastewater treatment plant can’t clean up fragments of superbugs — bacteria that have developed a resistance to antibiotics — and until now, almost no one has noticed.

The implications are unclear — researchers did not look for whole living bacteria, just for dead fragments of their genetic material — but experts are concerned. Superbugs have developed resistance to almost every kind of antibiotic. They are building resistance faster than science can create new drugs. Many of them are deadly.

Timothy LaPara and a team of researchers at the University of Minnesota in the Twin Cities, testing water pouring from a modern water treatment facility in Duluth, found genes of drug-resistant bacteria in the discharge. Most American cities do not have facilities as good as Duluth’s, but no one knows for sure how much worse the situation may be at those facilities because it has not been measured.

Read more

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

And the state doesn’t monitor for antibiotic-resistant bacteria, ADEQ officials said

Read more: http://azdailysun.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/panel-mixed-on-effluent-safety/article_edbbecff-56b0-5aae-ab44-7850a180b5bb.html#ixzz1h0aFPcsc

Then November brought news of a University of Minnesota study finding one of the more advanced sewage treatment plants in the country was releasing material found in drug-resistant bacteria that can sometimes be fatal for people, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). No live bacteria were found, however.

Public health experts said the finding from Minnesota was noteworthy and that few facilities nationwide were subject to testing that would detect the so-called “superbugs.”

Next week the City Council is expected to begin public hearings on the possible uses of reclaimed water in Flagstaff.

Arizona Vote To Contaminate Pristine Mountains with Treated Wastewater

 

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Gabrielle Giffords – Why Was She Targeted?

by admin on January 9, 2011

Looking at her view on the following issues doesn’t make a lot of sense that she would be a targeted by a nutcase who was opposing the government.

Energy

Giffords strongly supports renewable energy, in particular solar energy, as a top public policy priority.[35]

In September 2007 she published a report titled: The Community Solar Energy Initiative, Solar Energy in Southern Arizona, observing that Arizona has enough sunshine to power the entire United States. It reviews current energy usage and discusses how to increase the production of solar electricity.[36] On 1 August 2008 she wrote to congressional leaders regarding tax credits that were set to expire, saying that failure to extend the scheme would be extremely harmful to the renewable energy industry “just as it is beginning to take off.”[37]

Gun rights

Giffords supports gun rights.[38] She opposed the Washington D.C. gun ban, signing an Amicus curiae brief with the U.S. Supreme Court to support its overturn.[38][39] She has a D+ rating from the NRA[40] and a D- from the GOA.[41]

Immigration and border security

Rep. Giffords with the Commandant of the Coast Guard

Arizona’s 8th Congressional District is one of 10 in the country bordering Mexico. Giffords has stated that the Arizona SB1070 legislation is a “clear calling that the federal government needs to do a better job”[42] and saying that she hopes the legislation acts as a wake up call to the federal government. However, she stopped short of supporting the law itself, saying that it “does nothing to secure our border” and that it “stands in direct contradiction to our past and, as a result, threatens our future.” She also claimed that SB1070 kept Arizona from attracting students and businesses.[43]

On August 31, 2010, Giffords praised the arrival of National Guard troops on the border: “Arizonans have waited a long time for the deployment of the National Guard in our state. Their arrival represents a renewed national commitment to protecting our border communities from drug cartels and smugglers.“[44]

Giffords worked to secure passage of the August 2010 bill to to fund more Border Patrol agents and surveillance technology for Arizona’s border with Mexico. The legislation passed the House of Representatives only to be sent back by the U.S. Senate with reduced funding. Ultimately a $600 million bill was passed and signed in to law. The bill was over $100 million less than Giffords fought for, but she said that “This funding signals a stronger federal commitment to protect those Americans who live and work near the border.”[45]

In 2008, Giffords introduced legislation that would have increased the cap on the H-1B visa from 65,000 per year to 130,000 per year.[46] If that were not sufficient, according to her legislation, the cap would have been increased to 180,000 per year.[47] The bill would have allowed, at most, 50% of employees at any given company with at least 50 employees to be H-1B guest workers.[48] A large number of H-1B visas are used by outsourcing companies, as five of the top ten users of the visa are regularly outsourcing corporations.[49] Giffords claimed the bill would help high-tech companies in southern Arizona, some of which rely on H1-B employees.[48] Giffords’ bill was never voted on by the House of Representatives.

via Gabrielle Giffords – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }