by admin on March 13, 2013

SPECIALS: SPRING CLEAN UP, AERATION, MULCH, EDGING, NEW LAWN MOWING CONTRACTS!
S.A.R Contractors is a family owned & operated professional landscaping company, that guarantees your satisfaction. Over 20 years of experience, paver bricks specialist, passionate workers that enjoy working hard. They take on any projects, small or big. They design outdoor concepts to meet your demands and budget. Installation of new plants or trees is easy work for them, They are experts at reading landscape designs. Wether the job is as simple as mowing grass or more demanding as a HOA project, they will always deliver above expectations. Here at S.A.R, their goal is simply quality over fast work pace. they thrive to make your house the best looking house in the neighborhood. Be a part of their long list of happy customers and remember
“TO MAKE YOU SMILE IS THEIR PRIORITY”
CALL NOW (224) 770 0340
http://www.sarlandscaping.com/
Tagged as:
AERATION,
edging,
mulch,
NEW LAWN MOWING CONTRACTS,
SPRING CLEAN UP
Before EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge, and BAUER and
POSNER, Circuit Judges.
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge. The Supreme Court held
in District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), that
a federal enclave’s ban on operable handguns in the
home violates the Constitution’s second amendment.
In 2008 the City of Chicago and the Village of Oak Park
had ordinances that were functionally the same as the
2 Nos. 10-3957, 10-3965 & 11-1016
law in Heller. After the Supreme Court’s decision several
plaintiffs, including Otis McDonald and the National
Rifle Association, filed suits against the City and the
Village, which defended by arguing that the second
amendment does not apply to the states. The district
court agreed and dismissed the suits; we affirmed. 567
F.3d 856 (7th Cir. 2009). The Supreme Court granted a
petition for certiorari and concluded, to the contrary,
that the second amendment applies to states and municipalities
as a matter of due process. McDonald v. Chicago,
130 S. Ct. 3020 (2010).
Link
Tagged as:
gun ban,
Supreme Court