Posts tagged as:

John Steele

The pitch isn’t subtle. Lawyers behind the recent wave of mass file-sharing lawsuits in the US want to earn quick settlements from defendants rather than litigate years-long cases, so it’s no surprise that their settlement efforts are persistent. Settlement amounts are set at a few thousand dollars—enough to hurt but less than it would cost even to get a lawyer started on defending someone. In addition to the money, there’s the time—years of one’s life tied up in a court case—and the fact that most of these cases involve “adult content.”

The lawyers know all of this, and their settlement folks make all these points explicit while attempting extract cash from defendants. One such defendant, targeted in a mass file-sharing porn case in Illinois, provided us with a snapshot of what it’s like to be on the receiving end of these settlement attempts.

The defendant doesn’t live in Illinois, but starting a few months ago, he began receiving phone calls from someone in the Steele Hansmeier law offices. (John Steele, based in Chicago, has filed all of the current mass file-sharing lawsuits in the state; numerous judges are displeased by his tactics.) The calls have continued almost every business day since; the defendant doesn’t answer them any more, which means that he has ended up with a lengthy collection of voice mails, some of which he shared with us.

Link

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

As a lawyer, you know it’s going to be bad when a federal judge summons you to his courtroom at nine in the morning to talk about your “ill-considered lawsuit” that has “abused the litigation system in more than one way.”

Federal judge Milton Shadur, who keeps a “Now, 3 for 10¢… Federal Judge!” sign beside him in his 23rd floor Chicago courtroom, summoned file-sharing lawyer John Steele to court this morning with those words. At issue was Steele’s representation of CP Productions, an Arizona porn producer suing 300 anonymous individuals for illegally sharing a film called (ahem) Cowgirl Creampie.

Shadur had already had enough of this particular litigation and had tossed the case not once but twice within the last few weeks. The first dismissal came because Steele had not actually served all defendants in the case within 120 days of filing it (Steele pleaded that he was still waiting on ISPs to turn over the names associated with the IP addresses he had provided).

via Judge eviscerates P2P lawyer: “I accepted you at your word”.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }